SIS 201: The Making of the 21st
Century
Socratic Seminar:
Employ your time in improving
yourself by other [people's] writings, so that you shall gain easily what
others have labored hard for.
Through
doubt and systematic questioning of another person, one gets to ultimate truth.
TA: Dan Taninecz Miller
Sections: AE and AI
Sections: AE and AI
Email: taninecz@uw.edu
Office Hours: T 9:30-11:30 or by appointment
Office: TA Dungeon Thomson 035F
(Facing the bust of Henry Jackson turn right and walk around
behind the building. Walk down the creepy stairs. Turn left, then right, then
knock.)
Welcome to SIS 201 Socratic
Seminar!
In Socratic
style seminars you are asked to engage in active
learning. The purpose of a Socratic
Seminar is to achieve a deeper understanding about the ideas and values in a
text. This is a forum where you can engage in challenging and stimulating
debate; raise questions, comments or (informed) opinions that came to your mind
during Professor Lucero’s lectures or during your reading. You will be asked to
question and examine issues and principles related to a particular content, and
articulate different viewpoints. The discussion is not about right
answers – it is about the shared goal of reaching a deeper understanding of the
issues. You are encouraged to think out loud and to exchange ideas openly
while using examples and readings to support your point of view.
My role as
TA is to facilitate discussion, clarify lecture and reading material, and be
available for questions and comments as they relate to the course. This program
requires both analytic and creative rigor with the assumption that deep
engagement in media, aesthetic issues, and conceptual approaches can yield
communicable insights.
SIS 201 presents specific and unique
challenges for each of you as you pursue your academic goals and strive to meet
our expectations. For some, the program may seem at times slow or introductory;
for others, it may seem exceedingly difficult and obscure. You might find
yourself thinking that you’re the only one questioning or frustrated. Do not
remain silent and take the opportunity to come to me with questions or
requests.
General Expectations:
Respect – Arrive on
time; attendance will be taken at the beginning of
the class hour. Please do not pack up early. I will do my best to let
you out on time, but might have important announcements you could miss if you
pack up early.
Written assignments –
Please e-submit your papers to the Catalyst dropbox before quiz the day they
are due.
Readings – Do them.
It's easy to tell when the reading isn't being done, and Jackson School TA's
are famous for walking out of such classes in disgust. Knowing the material is
necessary to participate in the class discussion. More importantly, the actual
content of this class will emerge through reading. This class will require a
good bit of reading – plan accordingly and it is totally reasonable.
Participate – Speak up, be bold,
express your ideas. This process is integral to the Socratic Seminar. In order
to discuss the issues more effectively we will often divide up into small
groups to discuss readings together. These groups can then present a
perspective to the class to jump start the large group discussion.
I am much more willing to work with
you if I know about conflicts/concerns in advance so please inform me about
classes you may miss for legitimate reasons one
week prior.
Get a calendar and use it. Our work
requires that you participate in different groups for different reasons at
different times, that you meet deadlines over long and short periods. Sometimes
we write things so that we don’t have to say them. Read, listen carefully, and
attend class. No one can do it for you.
Questions/Comments – Please use emails
for logistical communications and not for
questions about the course material or your grades. If you have such questions,
please come to my office hours. I may take one or two days to answer your email
and I will probably not answer your emails on the weekends/holidays/the day
before an exam.
Note: All employees of UW are prohibited
from discussing grades via email.
Technology: This seminar is for discussion. As
such technology that facilitates discussion is permitted, while technology that
is irritating/distracting/frivolous is not. Cell phone use in the classroom is
obviously not going to happen. Use of a cell phone in class will affect your
participation grade, and I probably won't mention it at the time. During exams
you must turn your phone off.
Laptops are increasingly part of any professional or academic
environment. As such I am going to trust that your laptop is used for research
or note taking. In my class there is an implicit understanding that if you have
a laptop out it signifies you are engrossed in our discussion and plan to make
at least one significant verbal
contribution to the seminar that day.
I may call on you, or I may wait for your thoughts to organically bubble forth.
Catalyst: We will be using Catalyst tools heavily.
If you run into trouble there is a Catalyst help desk in Odegaard or come to
mine or another TA’s office hours.
Assignments
and Grading:
Grades will be based on three response papers,
participation in section, four quizzes, a final exam, and a research paper. The
grade breakdown is as follows:
3 Response papers: 15% (maximum
3 pages each)
Participation in
section: 10%
Research Paper: 40%--3%
for one paragraph-page statement, 7% for first draft, 30% for final draft
Quizzes: 5%
Final Exam: 30%
Late work
is not accepted.
Writing is an
essential part of this class and will be graded rigorously. We will spend
time in section preparing for your writing assignments. A clear thesis
statement will provide the framework for your argument in each paper; papers
that are simple summaries of the week’s readings will be returned to you
without a grade. Again, I am looking for an argument. Don't worry about whether
or not I might agree with the thesis, just argue your point as convincingly as
possible. Treat each piece of writing as an act of persuasion: take a
stance and convince me of your point of view. Assuming a hostile or disagreeing
audience is often helpful for establishing a solid paper. For extra help please
see me or visit the Political Science/JSIS/LSJ Writing Center in Gowen 105.
Anyone involved in plagiarism
will receive a 0 on the assignment and could be in for more drastic attention
should the situation warrant it. You could be asked to leave the course and
meet with a dean to discuss your future at the college. If you are ever
uncertain about whether something is plagiarism or not, consult a writing tutor
or your faculty before submitting it for credit. Specific information about
what plagiarism is and how to avoid it in your work maybe found here:
depts.washington.edu/pswrite/Handouts/Plagiarism.pdf
Student
Participation:
10% of
your course grade is based on participation and performance in section, which
will be subjectively determined by me based on your level of participation in
discussions and in various class exercises. Participation, and therefore
attendance, is integral to your success in this course. When you come to class,
you should have all the materials necessary for that day’s work; you should be
prepared to participate actively; you should be awake and alert!
Pop quizzes – Few times throughout the quarter over
assigned readings – in-class or via catalyst. NY Times assignments --
Every week 2-3 students will present a news piece in comparative perspective
and in relation to the lectures.
Readings --Please be prepared
for class by having the reading finished and bring readings to class.
No comments:
Post a Comment